Industry’s increased focus on vapor intrusion has escalated to the point where we regularly receive calls from clients saying, “Help! I have a vapor intrusion (VI) problem! How much will it cost to fix?” Perhaps not surprisingly, the answer is always a resounding, “That depends.”
New technologies are emerging, offering multiple methods of mitigating indoor air inhalation risks and meeting increasingly stringent screening levels. However, selecting the proper mitigation for either new construction or building retrofits can be daunting. Mitigation technologies and costs vary widely, depending upon the contaminant and the building construction.
Options, Options, Options…
There is no “one size fits all” solution for VI mitigation. Knowing both the site characteristics and the contaminants of concern is critical to selecting the most cost-effective mitigation option. The varying characteristics of different chemical compounds also have an impact. Mitigation approaches can include:
Ventilation
- Passive methods involve the installation of sub-slab piping connected to risers that run through the building structure; vent vapors to the atmosphere above roofline.
- Active methods add fans to pull vapors from beneath the slab and vent them at the stack.
- Active can be as simple as increasing air exchange rate by installing additional fans to the HVAC.
Pressurization/
Depressurization
- Prevent impacted soil gas from entering the structure using positive/negative pressure barrier.
- Sub-slab depressurization systems are deployed in existing structures by installing collection sumps equipped with extraction fans.
- Can use building’s HVAC system, ‘as is’ or enhanced to increase air flow, but requires routine monitoring and maintenance.
- Increased utility expense – more than that for just ventilation.
Source Control
- Includes vapor barriers, currently a popular approach for new construction.
- Spray-on barriers are easily installed and adaptable to a variety of foundation designs.
- When equipped with a passive venting layer – which can be converted to active – provides a redundant system at an affordable price.
- Covering of interior floor spaces with a low-permeability coating can be added to existing buildings without the need for costly floor removal or modifications.
Source remediation is also a valid approach but often not viable due to cost restrictions, construction deadlines, or the inability to access the source location without extensive intrusion and loss of rental revenue.
The Question of Cost
Implementation and operation & maintenance (O&M) costs are of paramount concern to building developers and owners – this is the tangible number they can relate to their construction and building operation budgets. But the vapor mitigation system should also be viewed as an asset. If the mitigation system is correctly installed and properly maintained, you can alleviate any concerns about using the building throughout the mitigation system’s expected lifetime.
Building size, construction, geographic location, and accessibility all impact pricing. Unit pricing for various VI mitigation methods can range widely, from less than $1 per square foot for simple ventilation approaches to as much as $70 per square foot for sites with significant access issues and higher construction labor costs. New materials combining construction applications, such as VI protection and waterproofing, have also entered the market in recent years. These products are more expensive per square foot individually, but provide combined savings to help meet technical goals while still remaining on budget.
The details make the difference when developing vapor intrusion mitigation strategies, whether for new or existing construction. Building owners, operators and others responsible for indoor air inhalation safety are urged to retain a consultant experience in VI mitigation, as well as conduct a thorough evaluation of current and potential future building uses before investing in any mitigation approach.
Looking for more information on methods and costs? Learn more on our Remediation Engineering page.
And as always, share your experiences in the comments section below.
Contributors to this blog include Graham Crockford, C.P.G., Engineering, Construction and Remediation Practice Lead, Stacy Metz, P.E., Project Engineer, and Darby Litz, L.P.G., Environmental Scientist.
Partager nos perspectives
Nos praticiens partagent leurs idées et leurs points de vue sur les tendances et les défis qui façonnent le marché.
Habiliter les intervenants à co-créer des solutions qui s’attaquent aux iniquités
avril 23, 2024
Pour s’attaquer aux inégalités et veiller à ce que les avantages de la transition vers l’énergie propre soient accessibles à tous, il faut examiner de près les processus auxquels on s’appuie depuis longtemps et qui peuvent avoir caché des inégalités enracinées en eux.
Environmental Site Assessments for Forest and Rural Properties
juillet 25, 2023
Key considerations for leveraging ASTM E2247 vs. E1527
Conducting an IAQ Inspection
septembre 1, 2022
Many investigation strategies can help you uncover IAQ concerns and sources. An initial inspection can help you get started. Learn more from our guide.
Screening ESG Risks in Autonomous Robotics Investments
septembre 9, 2021
Environmental, social & governance (ESG) issues are important considerations with autonomous robotics due to potential reputational risks.
The View on Climate Change has Changed in Washington
mars 1, 2021
The Biden Administration signals both a renewed and accelerated focus on climate change.
Vapor Intrusion Mitigation – Let Me Count the Ways
mars 2, 2020
Industry’s increased focus on vapor intrusion has escalated to the point where we regularly receive calls from clients saying, « Help! I have a vapor intrusion (VI) problem! How much will it cost to fix? » New technologies are emerging, offering multiple methods of mitigating indoor air inhalation risks and meeting increasingly stringent screening levels.
Shaping the Future of Energy Efficiency for Oregon’s Affordable Housing
février 27, 2019
Oregon embarks on a bold initiative to reduce energy costs among low income residents with the help of TRC.
TRC to Cap High-Profile Los Angeles Landfill as First Step in Ambitious Mixed-Use Makeover
novembre 28, 2018
TRC has been awarded a $100 million environmental management contract to help bring a former Los Angeles county landfill next to I-405 back to life.
EPA Revises Regulations for Air Conditioning and Refrigeration Equipment
mars 1, 2018
The EPA’s has revised its regulations regarding ozone-depleting refrigerant. Learn more about the new rules, which go into effect in 2019.
Security Stew: How to Follow the Federal Regulatory Recipe for Safe Chemical Storage
septembre 19, 2017
Three different federal agencies regulate the storage of chemicals at facilities in the United States – and each for different reasons. Learn about the various rules from the alphabet soup of agencies (DHS, EPA and OSHA) involved and how to keep your business compliant.
