Industry’s increased focus on vapor intrusion has escalated to the point where we regularly receive calls from clients saying, “Help! I have a vapor intrusion (VI) problem! How much will it cost to fix?” Perhaps not surprisingly, the answer is always a resounding, “That depends.”

New technologies are emerging, offering multiple methods of mitigating indoor air inhalation risks and meeting increasingly stringent screening levels. However, selecting the proper mitigation for either new construction or building retrofits can be daunting. Mitigation technologies and costs vary widely, depending upon the contaminant and the building construction.

Contact Us

Options, Options, Options…

There is no “one size fits all” solution for VI mitigation. Knowing both the site characteristics and the contaminants of concern is critical to selecting the most cost-effective mitigation option. The varying characteristics of different chemical compounds also have an impact. Mitigation approaches can include:

Ventilation

  • Passive methods involve the installation of sub-slab piping connected to risers that run through the building structure; vent vapors to the atmosphere above roofline.
  • Active methods add fans to pull vapors from beneath the slab and vent them at the stack.
  • Active can be as simple as increasing air exchange rate by installing additional fans to the HVAC.

Pressurization/
Depressurization 

  • Prevent impacted soil gas from entering the structure using positive/negative pressure barrier.
  • Sub-slab depressurization systems are deployed in existing structures by installing collection sumps equipped with extraction fans.
  • Can use building’s HVAC system, ‘as is’ or enhanced to increase air flow, but requires routine monitoring and maintenance.
  •  Increased utility expense – more than that for just ventilation.

Source Control

  • Includes vapor barriers, currently a popular approach for new construction.
  • Spray-on barriers are easily installed and adaptable to a variety of foundation designs.
  • When equipped with a passive venting layer – which can be converted to active – provides a redundant system at an affordable price.
  • Covering of interior floor spaces with a low-permeability coating can be added to existing buildings without the need for costly floor removal or modifications.

Source remediation is also a valid approach but often not viable due to cost restrictions, construction deadlines, or the inability to access the source location without extensive intrusion and loss of rental revenue.

The Question of Cost

Implementation and operation & maintenance (O&M) costs are of paramount concern to building developers and owners – this is the tangible number they can relate to their construction and building operation budgets. But the vapor mitigation system should also be viewed as an asset. If the mitigation system is correctly installed and properly maintained, you can alleviate any concerns about using the building throughout the mitigation system’s expected lifetime.

Building size, construction, geographic location, and accessibility all impact pricing. Unit pricing for various VI mitigation methods can range widely, from less than $1 per square foot for simple ventilation approaches to as much as $70 per square foot for sites with significant access issues and higher construction labor costs. New materials combining construction applications, such as VI protection and waterproofing, have also entered the market in recent years. These products are more expensive per square foot individually, but provide combined savings to help meet technical goals while still remaining on budget.

The details make the difference when developing vapor intrusion mitigation strategies, whether for new or existing construction. Building owners, operators and others responsible for indoor air inhalation safety are urged to retain a consultant experience in VI mitigation, as well as conduct a thorough evaluation of current and potential future building uses before investing in any mitigation approach.

Looking for more information on methods and costs? Learn more on our Remediation Engineering page.

And as always, share your experiences in the comments section below.

Contributors to this blog include Graham Crockford, C.P.G., Engineering, Construction and Remediation Practice Lead, Stacy Metz, P.E., Project Engineer, and Darby Litz, L.P.G., Environmental Scientist.

Achieve New
Possibilities

Partner With TRC’s Tested Practitioners

Contact Us

Sharing Our Perspectives

Our practitioners share their insights and perspectives on the trends and challenges shaping the market.

OR-MEP-TRC-DEI-Banner-4
Insights

Empowering Stakeholders to Co-Create Solutions that Address Inequity

April 23, 2024

Addressing inequality and ensuring that the benefits of the clean energy transition are accessible to all requires close examination of long-relied-upon processes that may have hidden inequities ingrained within them.

GettyImages-964949996
Insights

Environmental Site Assessments for Forest and Rural Properties

July 25, 2023

Key considerations for leveraging ASTM E2247 vs. E1527

indoor-air-quality-1
Insights

Conducting an IAQ Inspection

September 1, 2022

Many investigation strategies can help you uncover IAQ concerns and sources. An initial inspection can help you get started. Learn more from our guide.

6faa9ba5-kilmer
Doug Kilmer

Doug Kilmer, P.G. is Vice President of Renewables and Hydrogen at TRC. He has 30 years of professional experience representing stakeholders’ technical, logistical and financial interests. He is an expert in site characterization, energy siting and permitting, legacy site and remedial risk management, and Brownfield redevelopment. Doug’s expertise includes technical strategy development, regulatory interaction, stakeholder management, peer review, work plan preparation and implementation, and contractor supervision. He has led project teams providing siting, due diligence, development, construction and compliance on more than 10 GW of ground mount and rooftop solar PV, wind, energy storage, hydrogen and biomass/biogas developments. One of Doug’s specialties is supporting development of environmentally distressed properties, also known as Brightfields (e.g., brownfields, Superfund Sites, landfills and coal ash ponds) for solar power generation, hydrogen and power storage across the U.S. His work includes incentives structuring and management. Doug has spoken on this topic nationally and is currently engaged on such projects in multiple states. Contact Doug at dkilmer@trccompanies.com.